AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Postgresql alter table serial1/12/2024 But dropping serialness from an existing column or adding it to an existing column is not straightforward. You can specify serial as a column type when creating a table or when adding a column. Since serial is not a real type, it can only be used in certain circumstances. With an identity column, you don’t need to know the name of the sequence: ALTER TABLE test_new ALTER COLUMN id RESTART WITH 1000 Schema management You also need to know the name of the sequence if you want to make some changes to the sequence: ALTER SEQUENCE test_old_id_seq RESTART WITH 1000 Here, of course, it appears in the error message, and it is easy to guess, but sometimes a slightly different name is chosen, and then your deployment scripts will fail. If you have deployment scripts, this is annoying and problematic, because the name of the sequence is automatically generated. You can fix the error by also running GRANT USAGE ON SEQUENCE test_old_id_seq INSERT INTO test_new (payload) VALUES ('d') INSERT INTO test_old (payload) VALUES ('d') ĮRROR: permission denied for sequence test_old_id_seq One common problem is that permissions for the sequence created by a serial column need to be managed separately: CREATE USER foo The new way creates the sequence as a proper internal dependency of the table, so that various weird implementation details of the serial pseudotype are not exposed. The OWNED BY in the last command is an attempt to remember something about the serialness, but it is still insufficient in some cases. It expands this at parse time into something like CREATE SEQUENCE test_old_id_seq ĪLTER COLUMN id SET DEFAULT nextval('test_old_id_seq') ĪLTER SEQUENCE test_old_id_seq OWNED BY test_old.id PermissionsĪ general problem with the old way is that the system doesn’t actually remember that the user typed serial. So now you can move code around between, for example, PostgreSQL, DB2, and Oracle without any change (in this area). Some have lately been adopting the standard SQL syntax, however. Creating auto-incrementing columns has been a notorious area of incompatibility between different SQL implementations. The new syntax conforms to the SQL standard. INSERT INTO test_new (payload) VALUES ('a'), ('b'), ('c') RETURNING * ĭo pretty much the same thing, except that the new way is more verbose. Id int GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY, INSERT INTO test_old (payload) VALUES ('a'), ('b'), ('c') RETURNING * Depesz already wrote a blog post about it and showed that it works pretty much like serial columns: CREATE TABLE test_old ( insert into users values ('Jamie', 'EM3456') īy selecting from the users table again, we can see that the new row has had the id populated appropriately.For PostgreSQL 10, I have worked on a feature called “identity columns”. select * from users įinally, let's add a new user to our table. If we select from our users again, we can see that our existing users have already had their id populated. Now if we inspect our users table, we can see that there is a new column of type integer with a sequence that was generated for us by Postgres. The serial type is a Postgres shorthand for allowing us to create columns with an autoincrementing integer. alter table users add column id serial primary key To add an autoincrementing id as the primary key to our table, we can use the "alter table" command, passing our users table in, and then specifying that we want to add a column called id with the type "serial" and set it as our primary key. We can also select from this table and see that we already have data. We can inspect this table using the "\d" command. In this example, we're going to be dealing with a dummy database that has a table users, with no primary key currently set.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |